Везде
Doctrinal-legal standards in Russian judicial practice
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Doctrinal-legal standards in Russian judicial practice
Annotation
PII
S013207690003649-5-
DOI
10.31857/S013207690003649-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexandr Chashin 
Affiliation: Northeastern state University
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
56-64
Abstract

The article briefly monitors theoretical positions on the possibility of recognizing the legal doctrine as the current source (form) of the national law of representatives of Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian and Armenian legal science. As the main argument, the author studies the justification of law enforcement acts issued by the courts of a number of CIS member states with direct references to the doctrine of Roman law. The rationale for judicial acts is the understanding of the doctrine of Roman law, reciprocated by international and Russian law. With reference to the texts of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the author comes to the opinion that in the observed situation the role of the source (form) of law is played simultaneously by the legal doctrine and the constitutional-judicial decision as a flagship law enforcement act. The argument given in the article, illustrated by examples from judicial practice, sufficiently supported by references to Russian and foreign acts of justice, allows to recognize the ability of legal doctrine to be a source of both Russian law and to enter into the system of such sources of close national and legal systems.

Keywords
of law, source of law, Legal doctrine, legal principle, the Romano-German legal family, legal system
Received
20.02.2019
Date of publication
22.02.2019
Number of purchasers
96
Views
3008
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013207690003649-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 10.01.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Vasil'ev A. A. Pravovaya doktrina kak istochnik prava (Istoriko-teoreticheskie voprosy): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Barnaul, 2007.

2. Gambaryan A. S., Dallakyan L. G. Primenenie pravovoj doktriny v sudebnoj praktike: perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Aktual'nye problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva i pravoprimeneniya: materialy VI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Ufa, 31 maya 2016 g.) / pod obsch.red. A. V. Ragulina, I. T. Ragulinoj. Ufa, 2016. S. 25—29.

3. Gambaryan A. S., Dallakyan L. G. Primenenie pravovoj doktriny v sudebnoj praktike. Perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Evrazijskaya advokatura. 2016. № 6. S. 119—121.

4. Dervoed V. V. Doktrina (nauka) v kachestve istochnika prava v Respublike Belarus': avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 2006.

5. Zozulya A. A. Doktrina v sovremennom prave: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2006.

6. Zor'kin V. D. Konstitutsionnyj Sud Rossii: doktrina i praktika. M., 2017. S. 454.

7. Zor'kin V. D. Tsivilizatsiya prava i razvitie Rossii. M., 2016. S. 54.

8. Karapetyan S. A. Istochniki konstitutsionnogo prava Rossijskoj Federatsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov n/D., 1998. S. 47, 48.

9. Karmalita M. V. Pravova doktrina – dzherelo (forma) prava: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Kiїv, 2011.

10. Lazarev V. V. Poisk prava // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2004. № 7. S. 6, 11.

11. Lyubitenko D. Yu. Pravovaya doktrina Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2011.

12. Madaev E. O. Doktrina v pravovoj sisteme Rossijskoj Federatsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Irkutsk, 2012.

13. Nikonov A. O primenenii l'got, ne zakreplennykh v nalogovom zakone // Khozyajstvo i pravo. 1998. № 9. S. 80, 81.

14. Ordina O. N. Istochniki administrativnogo prava Rossii i problemy ikh sistematizatsii. M., 2015. S. 53, 54.

15. Parkhomenko N. M. Dzherela prava: problemi teorii ta metodologii. Kiiv, 2008.

16. Polyans'kij Є. Yu. Pro rozuminnya prirodi pravovoї doktrini v yuridichnij literaturi // Vіsnik Zaporіz'kogo natsіonal'nogo unіversitetu. «Yurid. nauki». 2014. № 4. S. 11—16.

17. Semenikhin I. V. Pravova doktrina: zagal'noteoretichnij analіz / nauk. red. O. V. Petrishin. Khar'kov, 2012. S. 56, 66.

18. Sivakova M. Ya. Obratnaya sila aktov zakonodatel'stva o nalogakh i sborakh: spornye voprosy pravoprimeneniya // Nalogovye spory: teoriya i praktika. 2007. № 10. S. 32, 33.

19. Sil'chanka M. U. Prablemy vyznachehnnya vidavaga skladu i klasifikatsyi krynits prava // Pravo i demokratiya: sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 12. Minsk, 2011. S. 33—43.

20. Telyukina M. V. Kommentarij k Federal'nomu zakonu «Ob aktsionernykh obschestvakh» (postatejnyj) (Podgotovlen dlya sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus», 2004) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 18.04.2017).

21. Fuller Lon L. Moral' prava. M., 2016. S. 136.

22. Fuller L. L. The morality of low. New Haven and London, 1965. R. 68.

23. Shlomo. Juristischer Grundlehre (2d ed. 1927). R. 383.

24. ????????? ?????????????? ???????????? ????????????? ????????? 17.0 6.1998, № ???247 / / ??? ???? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???? 1998.09.09/20(53).

25. ??????? ????????? ??/0052/01/15 [Ehlektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.datalex.am/?app= AppCase Search&case_id=2955487255465880 4 (data obrascheniya: 22.02.2017).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate