- PII
- S013207690003650-7-
- DOI
- 10.31857/S013207690003650-7
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 1
- Pages
- 65-74
- Abstract
The article analyzes the positive and negative consequences of using bibliometric tools to evaluate the results of scientific activity. The necessity of refusal from the official evaluation of the results of scientific activity of scientists and scientific (educational) organizations on the basis of the criterion of publication activity and relevant indicators is substantiated. It is offered to develop and approve the code of scientific ethics, the problem not only quantitative, but also thorough qualitative (substantial) systematization of scientific knowledge is activated.
- Keywords
- evaluation criterion, bibliometric approach, publication activity, systematization of scientific knowledge, scientific ethics
- Date of publication
- 22.02.2019
- Year of publication
- 2019
- Number of purchasers
- 96
- Views
- 2728
References
- 1. Bredikhin S. V., Kuznetsov A. Yu. Metody bibliometrii i rynok ehlektronnoj nauchnoj periodiki. Novosibirsk, M., 2012.
- 2. Bredikhin S. V., Kuznetsov A. Yu., Scherbakova N. G. Analiz tsitirovaniya v bibliometrii. Novosibirsk, M., 2013.
- 3. Idei i chisla. Osnovaniya i kriterii otsenki rezul'tativnosti filosofskikh i sotsiogumanitarnykh issledovanij. M., 2016. C. 153, 154.
- 4. Kodeks nauchnoj ehtiki. URL: http://www.courieredu.ru/cour0601/600.htm
- 5. Lazarev V. V. Yuridicheskaya nauka: prodolzhenie polemiki // LEX RUSSICA. 2015. № 11. S. 10—24.
- 6. Leont'ev A. N. Deyatel'nost', soznanie, lichnost'. 2-e izd. M., 1977. S. 210.
- 7. Nauchnaya ehtika [Ehlektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/599886 (data obrascheniya: 20.05.2018).
- 8. Pipiya L. K. K voprosu ob otsenke rezul'tatov nauchnoj deyatel'nosti [Ehlektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-ob-otsenke-rezultatov-nauchnoydeyatelnosti (data obrascheniya: 20.05.2018).
- 9. Polyakov S. B. Diagnostika pravosoznaniya pravoprimenitelej: ucheb. posobie. Perm', 2017. S. 5.
- 10. Psikhologicheskij slovar'. URL: http://psi.webzone.ru/st/054700.htm
- 11. Sverdlov E. D. Stat'ya mozhet khorosho tsitirovat'sya potomu, chto ona oshibochna. URL: https://indicator.ru/article/2018/02/07/impakt-faktor/
- 12. Tolstik V. A. Ot plyuralizma pravoponimaniya k bor'be za soderzhanie prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2004. № 9. S. 13—21.
- 13. Tolstik V. A., Trusov N. A. Bor'ba za soderzhanie prava. N. Novgorod, 2008.
- 14. Filosofiya, bibliometriya i upravlenie naukoj [Ehlektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/ideol/bibliometr/Phil_bibl_2.html (data obrascheniya: 20.05.2018).
- 15. Ehticheskij kodeks [Ehlektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AD%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81
