- PII
- S013207690003651-8-
- DOI
- 10.31857/S013207690003651-8
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 1
- Pages
- 75-84
- Abstract
Ecological jurisprudence emerged in the historical moment of transition from modern to postmodern, on the “postmodern turn” of legal science. Environmental problems in a some sense are rooted in the crisis of modern. As a means of restoration, ecological jurisprudence since its inception began rethinking, criticism and overcome the positions and views the traditional legal science. Since its inception, ecological jurisprudence has become a legal phenomenon filled with spirit and features of postmodernism. Paradigm of ecological jurisprudence has been characterized by “the peripheral position” and “advanced nature”, because it is the result and evidence of what happened in the modernist paradigm of legal science turn to post-modernism.
- Keywords
- ecological jurisprudence, theoretical paradigm, post-modernist jurisprudence, peripheral science, advanced edge science
- Date of publication
- 22.02.2019
- Year of publication
- 2019
- Number of purchasers
- 96
- Views
- 2326
References
- 1. Ao Shuankhun. Privatizatsiya publichnogo upravleniya i krizis traditsionnogo administrativnogo prava // Al'manakh obschestvennykh nauk. 2008. № 4.
- 2. Byorni P., Bojl A. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i okruzhayuschaya sreda / per. Na Li, Van Yan'chzhi, Van Syaogana. S. 81, 105.
- 3. Van Chzhikheh. Issledovanie postmodernistskogo techeniya v filosofii. Pekin, 2006. S. 17.
- 4. Van Shui. Ob'ektivnyj vzglyad na ob'ekt regulirovaniya ehkologicheskogo prava // Vestnik pravovedeniya. 2003. № 4.
- 5. Vvedenie v sovremennuyu filosofiyu prava i teoriyu prava / pod red. A. Kaufmana, V. Khassmera. Pekin, 2002. S. 23.
- 6. Gao Syuan'yan. Teoriya postmoderna. Pekin, 2005. S. 75.
- 7. Dehn Chzhehnlaj. Kuda idet kitajskaya yuridicheskaya nauka // Politiko-yuridicheskij forum. 2005. № 1.
- 8. Dyumon Lui. Ehsse ob individualizme / per. Guj Yujfan. Shankhaj, 2003. S. 3.
- 9. Kaufman A. Postmodernistskaya filosofiya prava: proschal'naya lektsiya / per. Mi Tszyanya. Pekin, 2000. S. 3.
- 10. Kellnel D., Best S. Teoriya postmoderna: kriticheskie somneniya / per. Chzhan Chzhibinya. Pekin, 2001. S. 1, 295, 335.
- 11. Kiss A. Mezhdunarodnoe ehkologicheskoe pravo / per. Chzhan Zhosy. Pekin, 2000. S. 45.
- 12. Kun T. Suschnostnoe napryazhenie / per. Tszi Shuli i dr. Fuchzhou, 1987. S. 291.
- 13. Li Khajpin. Krizis i transformatsiya sovremennogo administrativnogo prava v obschestve riska // Vestnik Shehn'chzhehn'skogo un-ta. Ser. «Gumanitarnye i sotsial'nye nauki». 2005. № 1.
- 14. Lyuj Chzhunmehj. Ot ratsional'nogo «ehkonomicheskogo cheloveka» k ehkologicheskomu razumnomu ehkonomi-cheskomu cheloveku: proekt statusa lichnosti v «zelenom grazhdanskom kodekse» // Chastnopravovye issledovaniya / gl. red. U Khan'dun. Vyp. 5. Pekin, 2005. № 38.
- 15. Lyuj Chzhunmehj, Li Tszyan'tszyun'. Teoreticheskoe soderzhanie i sovremennaya tsennost' «ehkologicheskogo cheloveka» // Vestnik Nankinskogo lesnogo un- ta. Ser. «Gumanitarnye i sotsial'nye nauki». 2008. № 2.
- 16. Lyan Khuehjsin. Ot grazhdanskogo prava Novogo vremeni k sovremennomu grazhdanskomu pravu: obzor grazhdanskogo prava v KhKh veke // Kitajskoe i zarubezhnoe pravovedenie. 1997. № 2.
- 17. Morris U. Teoriya prava. Ukhan', 2003. S. 1.
- 18. Mehj Khun. Kritika teorii regulirovaniya s tochki zreniya prava i interesa // Yugo-vostochnaya nauka. 2004. № 5.
- 19. Syuj Liyuan', Van Shehnvehj. Retseptsiya printsipa «obschej, no differentsirovannoj otvetstvennosti» dlya razvitiya instituta finansovo-nalogovoj otvetstvennosti i sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva // Lan'chzhouskij nauch. vestnik. 2014. № 8.
- 20. U Tszehbin', Lyu Vehjdun. Primenenie printsipa obschej, no differentsirovannoj otvetstvennosti v okhrane pakhotnykh zemel' v Kitae // Kitajskie nauki o zemle. 2010. № 9.
- 21. Khou Tszyazhu. Vozniknovenie nauki prava okruzhayuschej sredy i ego znachenie dlya yuridicheskoj nauki: tri metafory // Tszyankhajskij vestnik nauki. 2009. № 5.
- 22. Khou Tszyazhu. Issledovanie osnovnykh voprosov kitajskogo prava ehkologicheskikh pravonarushenij. Pekin, 2014. S. 87.
- 23. Khou Tszyazhu. Krizis sovremennosti grazhdanskogo prava Novogo vremeni i ego postmodernistskij povorot: k obsuzhdeniyu missii sovremennogo grazhdanskogo prava // Vestnik Kitajskogo politikoyuridicheskogo un-ta. № 2.
- 24. Tsaj Shoutsyu. Teoriya regulirovaniya: pereosmyslenie i dopolnenie gospodstvuyuschej teorii prava. Pekin, 2003. S. 46–50.
- 25. Tsaj Shoutsyu, U Syan'tszin. O soderzhanii i suschnosti «ehkologicheskogo cheloveka» // Sovremennoe pravovedenie. 2009. № 4.
- 26. Chzhehn Tsyan. Obzor postmodernistskoj teorii prava v SShA // Perevody i retsenzii zarubezhnogo prava. 2000. № 2.
- 27. Chehn' Tsyuan'shehn, Kheh Syaozhun. «Ehkologicheskij chelovek» i izmenenie pravovykh tsennostej // Sovremenoe pravovedenie. 2009. № 2.
- 28. Nathan A. Defining the “Common Heritage of Mankind” // In: Susskind L., Moomaw W., Gallagher K. (eds). Transboundary Environmental Negotiation: New Approaches to Global Cooperation. San Francisco, 2002. P. 3.
