Везде
The expert's opinion as evidence on economic disputes in the arbitration process
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The expert's opinion as evidence on economic disputes in the arbitration process
Annotation
PII
S013207690004437-2-
DOI
10.31857/S013207690004437-2
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga Smolina 
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
133-141
Abstract

The article dwells upon various features of the expert's statement as evidence on economic disputes in arbitration proceedings. The recognition of an establishment of the facts the expert as the examination purpose as a goal of proving is important for proof in the Russian arbitration process.

Features of the expert's statement as proofs in arbitration process are defined not only by the type of the facts (economic facts), but also by the essence of compulsory pre-trial procedures on economic disputes. Factual and evidentiary material is formed both in judicial and out of court.

The role of the court consists in an establishment of interaction between the economic facts and character of this interaction with the account of the facts established by the expert in the expert's statement.

At appointment of judicial examination as court the facts which are subject to an establishment the expert should be designated, questions to the expert are formulated, and also the evidentiary material represented for judicial examination is generated. Comparison of approaches in our country and in England to formation of an evidentiary material on economic disputes is made.

Keywords
law of evidence, proof, evidence, economic facts, purpose of forensic examination, expert's statement, essence of compulsory pre-trial procedures, court, economic dispute, arbitration process
Received
25.03.2019
Date of publication
28.03.2019
Number of purchasers
96
Views
3014
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013207690004437-2-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 20.03.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Abova T.E. Arbitrazhnyj process v SSSR (ponyatie, osnovnye principy) / otv. red. A.A. Mel'nikov. M., 1985 // Abova T.E. Izbr. trudy. Grazhdanskij i arbit-razhnyj process. Gra-zhdanskoe i hozyajstvennoe pravo. M., 2007.C. 374.

2. Arsen'ev V.D., Zablockij V.G. Ispol'zovanie special'nyh znanij pri ustanovlenii faktich-eskih obstoyatel'stv ugolovnogo dela. Krasnoyarsk, 1986. S. 4.

3. Bonner A.T. Tradicionnye i netradicionnye sredstva dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe. M., 2014. S. 275.

4. Vedeneev E. Yu. Dokazyvanie v arbitrazhnom processe Rossijskoj Federacii: pro-blemy teorii i praktiki na primere dokazyvaniya v sporah po imushchestvennomu strahovaniyu: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1999.

5. Kommentarij V.K. Puchinskogo k stat'e 82 APK RF // Kommentarij k Arbitrazhnomu processual'nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii (postatejnyj) / pod red. V.F. Yakovleva, M.K. Yukova. M., 2003.

6. Kratkij slovar' po filosofii / pod obshch. red. I.V. Blauberga, I.K. Pantina. M., 1982. S. 268, 269.

7. Kratkij filosofskij slovar' / A.P. Alekseev, G.G. Vasil'ev [i dr.]; pod red. A.P. Ale-kseeva. M., 2010. S. 304.

8. Pravila grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva (Civil Procedure Rules). URL: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part32#32.1

9. Renc I.G. Fakty i dokazatel'stva v mezhdunarodnyh sporah: mezhdu istinoj i spraved-livost'yu. M., 2018. S. 190.

10. Sadikov O.N. Principy mezhdunarodnyh kommercheskih dogovorov UNIDRUA v praktike MKAS pri TPP RF // Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh: sovremennye problemy i resheniya: sb. st. k 80-letiyu Mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazhnogo suda pri Torgovo-promyshlennoj palate Rossijskoj Federacii / pod red. A.A. Kostina. M., 2012 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

11. Smolina O.S. Dokazatel'stva po ekonomicheskim sporam v arbitrazhnom processe // Vklad molodyh uchenyh v razvitie pravovoj nauki Respubliki Belarus': sb. materialov VI Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Minsk, 2 iyunya 2017 g. / redkol. S.M. Sivec [i dr.]. Minsk, 2017. S. 211.

12. Smolina O.S. Dokazyvanie i dokazatel'stva pri osparivanii nenormativnyh pravovyh aktov po rezul'tatam nalogovyh proverok v arbitrazhnom sude: avtore-ferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2015. S. 8.

13. Smolina O.S. Zaklyuchenie eksperta kak dokazatel'stvo v arbitrazhnom processe // Teoretiko-prikladnye problemy realizacii i zashchity sub"ektivnyh prav v kontekste innovacion-nogo social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya obshchestva: tezisy dokladov Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashchennoj pamyati N.G. Yurkevicha. Minsk, 20 - 21 apr. 2018 g. / redkol.: O.N. Zdrok (otv. red.) [i dr.]. Minsk, 2018. S. 547, 548.

14. Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnye dokazatel'stva. M., 2016. S. 215.

15. Filosofskij slovar' / pod red. I.T. Frolova. M., 1981.

16. Haziev Sh. N. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i sudebnaya ekspertiza. M., 2014. S. 36.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate