RAS History & PhilologyИзвестия Российской Академии наук. Серия литературы и языка Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka

  • ISSN (Print) 1605-7880
  • ISSN (Online) 2413-7715

Dividuals Are Not Individuals. Personality Before and After Modernity

PII
S013216250016972-2-
DOI
10.31857/S013216250016972-2
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 12
Pages
91-100
Abstract

The article discusses the issue of the dominant personality type and identity in pre-modern, modern and post-modern societies. The thesis is put forward that the personality of the postmodernity is different from the personality of the modernity and is similar to the personality of the premodernity. In contrast to the modern society of the Gesellschaft type - society, the premodern society as conceptualized by F. Tönnies is Gemeinschaft - community, the integral characteristic of which is unitiveness - undifferentiation. In a community, the individual is dissolved in a social environment, his/her self is consubstantial with the transgenerative self of the group - family, clan, totem, etc. The most striking example of this is the longest history of hunter-gatherer sociality. At the same time, in accordance with the principle of metacontrast, a primitive individual, minimally separated from the external, is maximally divided internally: his personality/identity is plural, which finds its expression in the fact of a plurality of names and the idea of a plurality of souls of each individual. Therefore, he/she should be viewed not as an individual, but as a dividual. These include not only archaic foragers, but also members of the post-industrial/network/information society. They, in contrast to the integral individuality of modernity, according to a number of sociological theories and observations, are not individuals and have multiple identities. The displacement of individuality by dividuality can be thought of as a tendency to re-archaization of postmodern sociality, due to the development of information and communication technologies, which makes its sociality similar to premodernity.

Keywords
modern, premodern, postmodern, society, community, individual, dividual
Date of publication
24.12.2021
Year of publication
2021
Number of purchasers
6
Views
229

References

  1. 1. Bard A., Zoderkvist J. (2004) Netocracy. The new ruling elite and life after capitalism. St. Petersburg: SShE v SPb. (In Russ.)
  2. 2. Deskola F. (2012) Beyond Nature and Culture. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)
  3. 3. Eriksen T.H. (2014) What Is Anthropology? Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
  4. 4. Frazer J.G. (1986) The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)
  5. 5. Harari Yu.N. (2018) Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Moscow: Sinbad. (In Russ.)
  6. 6. Kon I.S. (1978) Discovery of "I". Moscow: Politizda.t (In Russ.)
  7. 7. Kon I.S. (1984) In Search of Oneself: Personality and Its Self-Consciousness. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)
  8. 8. Latour B. (2014) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
  9. 9. Law J. (2015) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Moscow: In-t Gaidara. (In Russ.)
  10. 10. Levi-Strauss K. (2008) Totemism. The Savage Mind. Moscow: Akadem. Proekt. (In Russ.)
  11. 11. Lévy-Bruhl L. (1930) Primitive thinking. Moscow: Ateist. (In Russ.)
  12. 12. Lévy-Bruhl L. (2002) Primitive Mentality. St. Petersburg: Evropeiskiy Dom. (In Russ.)
  13. 13. Maslow A. (1999) The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. St. Petersburg: Evraziya. (In Russ.)
  14. 14. Mason P. (2016) Post Сapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russ.)
  15. 15. Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia: in 2 volumes. Vol. 1. (1994). Moscow: Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya. (In Russ.)
  16. 16. Semenov Yu.I. (1989) At the dawn of human history. Moscow: Mysl'. (In Russ.)
  17. 17. Shakhnovich M.I. (1971) Primitive Mythology and Philosophy. Leningrad: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  18. 18. Shipilov A.V. (2003) Dialectics of Society. The experience of building a structural-evolutionary model of the sociocultural continuum. Voronezh: TSCHKI. (In Russ.)
  19. 19. Shipilov A.V. (2008) "Ours", "strangers" and others. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. (In Russ.)
  20. 20. Shipilov A.V. (2016) Labor and Life of the Russian Peasantry in the First Half of the 18th Century. Voronezh: VSPU. (In Russ.)
  21. 21. Sorokin P.A. (1993) The system of sociology. Vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  22. 22. The history of primitive society. General issues. Anthroposociogenesis problems (1983). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  23. 23. The history of primitive society. The era of class formation (1988). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  24. 24. Tokarev S.A. (1990) Early forms of religion. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)
  25. 25. Tönnies F. (2002) Community and Society. Moscow: Fond Universitet; St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal'. (In Russ.)
  26. 26. Tylor E.B. (1989) Primitive culture. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)
  27. 27. Urry J. (2012) Mobilities. Moscow: Praxis. (In Russ.)
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library