RAS History & PhilologyИзвестия Российской Академии наук. Серия литературы и языка Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka

  • ISSN (Print) 1605-7880
  • ISSN (Online) 2413-7715

The Main Trends in the Contemporary F. M. Dostoevsky Studies

PII
S241377150010950-8-
DOI
10.31857/S241377150010950-8
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 79 / Issue 4
Pages
67-83
Abstract

This survey article is devoted to Russian and foreign individual and collective monographs about Dostoevsky published over the recent three years (2017–2019). It contains a rather detailed bibliography of such publications; some of them are analyzed in detail. A number of new biographical materials are presented, which have been recently published recently and have significantly enriched our understanding of the writer’s life. Particular attention is paid to works of hermeneutic and psychoanalytical nature, in which new approaches to Dostoevsky are outlined. Many of them, according to the author, can serve as an excellent illustration of how the tools, borrowed from the famous works of Mikhail Bakhtin, increasingly find themselves unsuited to Dostoevsky’s artistic thought. In the work, some methodological principles for conducting comparative studies dealing with source criticism are also formulated and demonstrated through examples. According to the article, a breakthrough in the Dostoevsky studies might occur only on the basis of a downright dismissal of all the prisms alien to the writer’s thought, through which it became customary to investigate him, including not only the Marxist and structuralist perspectives, but also the Orthodox Christian and Bakhtinian ones.

Keywords
Dostoevsky, trend, main, studies, research, works, poetics, interpretation, biography
Date of publication
29.09.2020
Year of publication
2020
Number of purchasers
24
Views
3012

References

  1. 1. Blake, Elisabeth A. Travels from Dostoevsky’s Siberia. Encounters with Polish Literary Exiles. Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2019. 219 p.
  2. 2. Dostoevskij F.M. Poln. sobr. sochinenij: V 30 t. L.: Nauka, 1972–1990.
  3. 3. Corrigam, Yuri. Dostoevsky and the Riddle of the Self. Northwestern University Press, 2017. 238 p.
  4. 4. Esaulov I.A. Ob'yasnenie, interpretatsii, ponimanie (Na materiale romana “Idiot”) // Dostoevskij i mirovaya kul'tura. Al'manakh № 37. SPb.: Serebryanyj vek, 2019. S.38–50.
  5. 5. Makarichev F.V. Khudozhestvennaya individologiya v poehtike F.M. Dostoevskogo. Sankt-Peterburg: EhleksSis, 2016. 374 s.
  6. 6. Panchenko A.M. “Ya ehmigriroval v drevnyuyu Rus'”. Rossiya istoriya i kul'tura. SPb.: Izd-vo zhurnala “Zvezda”, 2005. 544 s.
  7. 7. Esaulov I.A. Russkaya klassika: novoe ponimanie. Izd. 3-e. SPb.: Izd-vo Russkoj khristianskoj gumanitarnoj akademii, 2017. 550 s.
  8. 8. Esaulov I.A. Khudozhestvennyj mir Dostoevskogo v svete oppozitsii “yurodstvo/shutovstvo” i pozitsiya Bakhtina. Na materiale fantasticheskogo rasskaza “Krotkaya” // Dostoevskij i mirovaya kul'tura. Al'manakh № 36. SPb.: Serebryanyj vek, 2018. S. 75–86.
  9. 9. Bakhtin M.M. Problemy poehtiki Dostoevskogo. M.: Izd-vo “Eh”, 2017. 637 s.
  10. 10. Kantor V.A. Izobrazhaya, ponimat', ili Sententia sensa: filosofiya v literaturnom tekste. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2018. 826 s.
  11. 11. Krinitsyn A.B. Syuzhetologiya romanov F.M. Dostoevskogo. M.: MAKS Press, 2017. 455 s.
  12. 12. Tikhomirov B.N. “Katekhizis revolyutsionera” Sergeya Nechaeva. Istoricheskij dokument i ego rol' v tvorcheskoj istorii romana “Besy” // Dostoevskij i mirovaya kul'tura. Filologicheskij zhurnal. 2019. № 3. S. 162–178.
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library