References

Additional sources and materials

1. Aver'yanov L.Ya. Iskusstvo zadavat' voprosy: Zametki sotsiologa. M.: Mosk. rabochij, 1987.
2. Zhuravlev V.F. Analiz kommunikatsij v kachestvennom interv'yu // Sotsiologiya: 4 M. 1996. № 7. S. 86109. 
3. Pilkington X., Omel'chenko E. «Zachem mne vrat'?» Opyt primeneniya interv'yu k izucheniyu russkoyazychnoj migratsii // Rubezh. 1997. № 10-11. S. 190-209.
4. Obligacion F.R. Managing perceived deception among respondents: A traveler's tale // Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 1994. Vol. 23. № 1. P. 29-50. 
5. Shlyapentokh V.Eh. «Sovetskie sotsiologi luchshe amerikantsev v organizatsii oprosov»: Interv'yu B. Doktorovu // Sotsial'naya real'nost'. 2006. № 12. S. 67-77.
6. Hyman N.N. Do they tell the truth? // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1944. Vol. 8. № 4. P. 557-559. 
7. Weaver C.N., Swanson C.L. Validity of reported date of birth, salary, and seniority // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1974. Vol. 38. № 1. P. 69-80. 
8. Rodgers J.L., Billy J.O.G., Udry J.R. The rescission of behaviors: Inconsistent responses in adolescent sexuality data // Social Science Research. 1982. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 280-296.
9. Orwin R.G., Boruch R.F. RRT meets RDD: Statistical strategies for assuring response privacy in telephone surveys // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1982. Vol. 46. № 4. P. 560-571. 
10. Hamilton L.C. Self-reports of academic performance: Response errors are not well behaved // Sociological Methods and Research. 1981. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 165-185.
11. Tourangeau R., Rips L., Rasinski K. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, Engl.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
12. Folomeeva N.M., Shurygina I.I., Novikova N.A., Chekineva T.V. Opyt primeneniya biograficheskogo metoda v issledovanii problem narkomanii // Narkomaniya kak forma deviantnogo povedeniya / Pod obsch. red. M.E. Pozdnyakovoj. M.: IS RAN, 1997. S. 55-69.
13. Jones E., Forrest J. Underreporting of abortions in surveys of US women: 1976 to 1988 // Demography. 1992. Vol. 29. № 1. P. 113-126. 
14. Jobe J.B., Pratt W.F., Tourangeau R. et al. Effects of Interview Mode on Sensitive Questions in a Fertility Survey // Survey Measurement and Process Quality / Ed. by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins et al. N. Y.: Wiley, 1997. P. 311-352.
15. Tourangeau R., Smith T.W. Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 60. № 2. P. 275-304. 
16. Billiet J., Loosveldt G. Improvement of the quality of responses to factual survey questions by interviewer training // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1988. Vol. 52. № 2. P. 190-211.
17. Groves R.M. Actors and questions in telephone and personal interview surveys // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1979. Vol. 43. № 2. P. 190-205. 
18. Kraus L., Augustine R. Measuring alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems: Comparison of responses from self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews // Addiction. 2001. Vol. 96. № 4. P. 459-471.
19. Dawson D.A. Methodological issues in measuring alcohol use // Alcohol Research and Health. 2003. Vol. 27. № 1. P. 18-29. 
20. Tapilina B.C. Skol'ko p'et Rossiya? Ob'em, dinamika i differentsiatsiya potrebleniya alkogolya // Sotsiol. issled. 2006. № 2. S. 85-94. 
21. Zaigraev G.G. Osobennosti rossijskoj modeli potrebleniya nekommercheskogo alkogolya // Sotsiol. issled. 2002. № 12. S. 33-41. 
22. Lowe J.B., Windsor R.A., Adams V. et al. Use of a bogus pipeline method to increase accuracy of self-reported alcohol consumption among pregnant women // Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1986. Vol. 47. № 1. P. 173-175.
23. Aquilino W.S. Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 58. № 2. P. 210-240. 
24. Gmel G. The effect of mode of data collection and of non-response on reported alcohol consumption: A split-sample study in Switzerland // Addiction. 2000. Vol. 95. № LP. 123-134.
25. Sadmen S., Brehdbern N. Kak pravil'no zadavat' voprosy: Vvedenie v proektirovanie massovykh obsledovanij: Per. s angl. A.A. Vinitskoj; Nauch. red. perevoda D.M. Rogozin. M.: In-t Fonda «Obschestvennoe mnenie», 2002. 
26. Karp J.A., Brockington D. Social desirability and response validity: A comparative analysis of overreporting voter turnout in five countries // Journal of Politics. 2005. Vol. 67. № 3. P. 825-840.
27. Cannell C.F., Miller P.V., Oksenberg L. Research on Interviewing Techniques // Sociological Methodology. 1981. Vol. 11 / Ed. by S. Leinhardt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981. P. 389-437.
28. Myagkov A.Yu., Zhuravleva I.V. Ehffekt interv'yuera v personal'nom interv'yu: Metodologiya analiza i metody otsenki / Ivan. gos. ehnerg. un-t. Ivanovo, 2006. 
29. Singer E., Mathiowetz N.A., Couper M.P. The impact of privacy and confidentiality concerns on survey participation: The case of the 1990 U.S. census // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1993. Vol. 57. № 4. P. 465-482. 
30. Znakov V.V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya pravdy. SPb.: Aletejya, 1999. 
31. Ajzen L., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. N. Y.: Addison Wesley, 1980.
32. Reinecke J., Schmidt P. Explaining interviewer effects and respondent behavior: Theoretical models and empirical analysis // Quality and Quantity. 1993. Vol. 27. № 3. P. 219-247.
33. Rogozin D.M. Rezul'tativnost' telefonnogo oprosa v zavisimosti ot ogranichenij na vybor respondenta vnutri domokhozyajstva // Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal. 2005. № 3. S. 52-84. 
34. Johnson T., Fendrich M., Shaligram Ch. et al. An evaluation of interviewer characteristics in an RDD telephone survey of drug use // Journal of Drug Issues. 2000. Vol. 30. № 1. P. 77-101. 
35. Huddy L., Billig J., Bracciodieta J. et al. The effect of interviewer gender on the survey response // Political Behavior. 1997. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 197-220. 
36. Schuman H., Converse J. The effects of black and white interviewers on black response in 1968 // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1971. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 44-66. 
37. Schaeffer N.C. Evaluating race-of-interviewer effects in a national survey // Sociological Methods and Research. 1980. Vol. 8. № 4. P. 400-419. 
38. Anderson V., Silver V., Abramson P. The effects of race of the interviewer on race-related attitudes of black respondents in SRC/CPS national election studies // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1988. Vol. 52. № 2. P. 289-324.
39. Myagkov A.Yu. Tekhnika «randomizirovannogo otveta»: Opyt polevogo testirovaniya // Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal. 2002. № 4. S. 60-77. 
40. Lara D., Garcia S.G., Ellertson Ch. et al. The measure of induced abortion levels in Mexico using random response technique // Sociological Methods and Research. 2006. Vol. 35. № 2. P. 279-301. 
41. Thornton V., Gupta S. Comparative validation of a partial (versus full) randomized response technique: Attempting to control for social desirability response bias to sensitive questions // Individual Differences Research. 2004. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 214-224.
42. Nass C., Robles E., Bienenstock H. et al. Speech-based disclosure systems: Effects of modality, gender of prompt, and gender of user // International Journal of Speech Technology. 2003. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 113-121. 
43. Catania J., Binson D., Canchola J. et al. Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item context on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 60. № 3. P. 345-375.
44. Brehm S.S., Kassin S.M. Social Psychology. 2-d ed. Boston, Ma: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1993. 
45. Schaeffer N.C., Presser S. The science of asking questions // Annual Review of Sociology. 2003. Vol. 29. № 1. P. 65-88.