Везде
Constitution and values of the constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Constitution and values of the constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm
Annotation
PII
S013207690002199-0-1
DOI
10.31857/S013207690002199-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Igor A. Kravets 
ORCID: 0000-0001-5291-7177
Affiliation: Novosibirsk State University
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Issue 12
Pages
44-55
Abstract

The article formulates and justifies the methodological understanding of constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm. It considers the theoretical bases of constitutional teleology and constitutional axiology, their correlation in the Russian constitutionalism, identification and polysemy of constitutionalism; universality, plurality and public interest as the values of constitutionalism; teleological norms as constitutional requirements, the correlation of legal and moral values in a large and small circle of constitutionalism. The author used general and specific scientific methods, formal legal, specific historical, comparative legal and complex analysis of legal acts, state-legal and interstate practice, methods of constitutional design and legal hermeneutics for interpreting the normative foundations and prospects for improving Russian constitutionalism in the conditions of formation global constitutionalism. The novelty of the study is to comprehend the polysemy of constitutionalism in the domestic and comparative jurisprudence, to develop the theoretical foundations of constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm.

Keywords
constitutionalism, polysemy, constitutional teleology, axiology, constitutional requirements, constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm, constitution, constitutionality, public interest, stability and dynamism
Acknowledgment
The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-011-00761 А.
Date of publication
22.12.2018
Number of purchasers
12
Views
2722
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Kabyshev V.T. Rossijskij konstitutsionalizm na rubezhe tysyacheletij // Pravovedenie. 2001. № 4 (237). S. 61, 62.

2. Kravets I.A. Konstitutsionalizm v sravnitel'nom izuchenii i prepodavanii // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2009. № 6. S. 72–82.

3. Kravets I.A. Rossijskij konstitutsionalizm: teoretiko-metodologicheskie i istoricheskie aspekty formirovaniya // Pravo i politika. 2002. № 6. S. 8–15.

4. Kutafin O.E. Rossijskij konstitutsionalizm. M., 2008.

5. Schwöbel, Christine E J. Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective. Leiden, Brill, 2011. P. 1.

6. Fassbender B. The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community. Leiden/Boston, 2009. P. 1, 2.

7. Teubner G. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford, 2012. P. 2, 3.

8. Ehbzeev B.S. Sovremennyj konstitutsionalizm kak sinteticheskoe edinstvo estestvennogo i pozitivnogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2015. № 12. S. 5–15.

9. Chistyukhina S. N. Mezhotraslevaya polisemiya v terminologicheskoj sisteme sovremennogo anglijskogo yazyka: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. M., 2011.

10. Skrebtsova T.G. Kognitivnaya lingvistika: kurs lektsij. SPb., 2011. S. 8, 9.

11. Phillipson G, Williams A. Horizontal Effect and the Constitutional Constraint // Modern Law Review. 2011. Vol. 74. Issue 6. P. 878–910. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00876

12. Dzhagaryan A.A. Gorizontal'nyj konstitutsionalizm: osnovaniya i perspektivy // Konstitutsionnoe pravo: itogi razvitiya, problemy i perspektivy: sb. materialov Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. / otv. red. S.A. Avak'yan. M., 2017. S. 47–53.

13. Williams B. Horizontal Federalism Inches Along: New Jersey's Experiment in State Constitutionalism and Consent Searches Finally Finds Company // Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights. 2000. Vol. 5. Issue 1. P. 1–26.

14. Oliver D. Common Values and the Public-Private Divide. London, 1999.

15. Jurgens G., Van Ommeren F. The public-private divide in English and Dutch law: a multifunctional and context-dependant divide // The Cambridge Law Journal. 2012. V. 71. Issue 1. P. 172–199. DOI: 10.1017/S0008197312000244

16. Raz J. On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries // Constitutionalism. Philosophical Foundations / ed. by A. Larry. Cambridge, 1998. P. 154, 155.

17. Khovard Dik A.E. Konstitutsionalizm // Verkhovenstvo prava: sb. / per. s angl. M., 1992. S. 53.

18. Kravets I.A. Printsipy rossijskogo konstitutsionalizma i konstitutsionalizatsiya pravovogo poryadka. M., 2017. S. 211.

19. Galston W. Pluralist constitutionalism // Social Philosophy and Policy. 2011. Vol. 28, Issue 1. P. 228–241. DOI: 10.1017/S0265052510000117

20. Elkins Z., Ginsburg T., Melton J. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge, 2009.

21. Manasyan A.A. Stabil'nost' konstitutsii kak vazhnejshaya predposylka ukrepleniya konstitutsionalizma v sovremennykh gosudarstvakh // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2013. № 5 (96). S. 21–31.

22. Bondar' N.S. Sudebnyj konstitutsionalizm: postanovka problemy v kontekste roli Konstitutsionnogo Suda v utverzhdenii “zhivogo” rossijskogo konstitutsionalizma. T. 68 // Lex Russica. 2009. № 2. S. 343.

23. Oliver D. Psychological constitutionalism // The Cambridge Law Journal. 2010. Vol. 69, Issue 3. P. 639–675. DOI: 10.1017/S0008197310000838

24. Ackerman B. The Rise of World Constitutionalism // Virginia Law Review 1997. Vol. 83. P. 771.

25. Young E. A. The Trouble with Global Constitutionalism // Texas International Law Journal. 2003. Vol. 38. P. 527.

26. Wiener A., Lang A.F., Tully J., Maduro M.P., Kumm M. Global constitutionalism: Human rights, democracy and the rule of law // Global Constitutionalism. 2012. Vol. 1. Issue 1. P. 1–15.

27. Ehbzeev B.S. Globalizatsiya i stanovlenie transnatsional'nogo konstitutsionalizma // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2017. № 1. S. 5–15.

28. Bondar' N.S. Aksiologiya sudebnogo konstitutsionalizma: konstitutsionnye tsennosti v teorii i praktike konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. Ser. "Bibliotechka sudebnogo konstitutsionalizma". Vyp. 2. M., 2013.

29. Dzhagaryan A.A., Dzhagaryan N.V. Apologiya tsennostnogo podkhoda v konstitutsionnom prave i pravosudii // Yuridicheskij mir. 2014. № 2. S. 27–34.

30. Gadzhiev G.A. Tseli, zadachi i prednaznachenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii (chasti I i II) // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2008. № 1. S. 10–16; № 2. S. 8–11.

31. Petin I.A. Konstitutsionnaya napravlennost' tselej nakazaniya i zadach ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Ross. yustitsiya. 2011. № 8. S. 17–21.

32. Stepanova A.A. Konstitutsionnye tseli i zakonodatel'stvo ob organizatsii gosudarstvennoj vlasti // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 3. S. 16–19.

33. Dobrynin N.M. O kategorii tselepolaganiya v kontekste konstitutsionalizma // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. № 11. S. 13.

34. Aleshkova I.A., Vlasova T.V. Konstitutsionnoe predpisanie kak pravovaya kategoriya // Tam zhe. 2018. № 6. S. 82.

35. Mitskevich A.V. Akty vysshikh organov Sovetskogo gosudarstva. Yuridicheskaya priroda normativnykh aktov vysshikh organov vlasti i upravleniya SSSR. M., 1967. S. 34.

36. Fedorov M.V. Sravnitel'no-pravovye issledovaniya konstitutsionalizma // Sravnitel'nye issledovaniya pravovykh sistem, pravovykh kul'tur: ucheb. posobie / pod red. M.V. Nemytinoj. M., 2016. S. 188.

37. Nenovski N. Pravo i tsennosti / per. s bolg.; vstup. st. i per. V.M. Safronova; pod red. V.D. Zor'kina. M, 1987. S. 25.

38. Perepelitsa E.V. Poznavatel'nye zadachi i vozmozhnosti konstitutsionnoj aksiologii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2016. № 10. S. 11–14.

39. Kravets I.A. Sudebnaya konstitutsionalizatsiya obespecheniya osnovnykh prav i svobod i problema ispolneniya reshenij mezhgosudarstvennogo organa po zaschite prav i svobod cheloveka // Obespechenie prav i svobod cheloveka v sovremennom mire: materialy konf: v 4 ch. Ch. 1. M., 2017. S. 212–216.

40. Arutyunyan A.A. Konstitutsionalizm: problemy postsovetskoj real'nosti. M., 2013. S. 82–90.

41. Strashun B. Konstitutsiya Rossii – sreda obitaniya, trebuyuschaya ratsional'nogo ispol'zovaniya // Konstitutsionnoe pravo. Vostochnoevropejskoe obozrenie. 1999. № 4 (29). S. 145–148.

42. Demidov V.N. Konstitutsiya RF i edinstvo konstitutsionno-pravovogo prostranstva Rossijskoj Federatsii // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2009. № 6. S. 14–23

43. King An. The British Constitution. Oxford, 2007.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate