Abstract
The article provides for the systemic analysis of regulatory prescriptions of the code of criminal procedures, determining the prosecutor’s procedural status in a criminal process. Most these prescriptions proved to be insufficiently consecutive, contradictory and ambiguous. This justifies the need for relevant amendments and addenda to the law, allowing to make the right perception on the true procedural status of the prosecutor, as well as on his / her authorities.
Keywords
Key words: prosecutor, prosecutor’s procedural powers, criminal procedure tasks, criminal procedure functions, criminal prosecution, accusation, adversarial process, parties of the criminal process, prosecutor’s supervision
Comments
No posts found