- PII
- S1811-833X0000616-7-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/SX0000616-7-1
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Abstract
- The article is a response to the arguments by O. B. Koshovets and I. E. Frolov on the emergence of "technoscience”. Technoscience is opposed by the authors to the classical science characterized by the dominance of the technological component of research and capitalization of knowledge. The article focuses on two tasks. The first one supposes an appeal to the historical origins of technoscience and demonstrates significant relationship between technoscience and classical science. The second one involves the disclosure of contemporary negative trends of technoscience as creating conditions for their own overcoming. In conclusion it associates the work on the autonomy of science with the constructive dialogue between scientific and non-scientific knowledge.
- Keywords
- scientific-technical revolution, autonomy of science, problem of demarcation
- Date of publication
- 01.03.2020
- Year of publication
- 2020
- Number of purchasers
- 22
- Views
- 593
RAS History & PhilologyИзвестия Российской Академии наук. Серия литературы и языка Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka
- ISSN (Print) 1605-7880
- ISSN (Online) 2413-7715
Technoscience: “Where the Danger Is, Grows the Saving Power Also”
Indexing
Scopus
Crossref
Higher Attestation Commission
At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
Scientific Electronic Library