Issue 1 :: What should be understood as sources of knowledge in criminal proceedings? - The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language

Home>Issue 1>What should be understood as sources of knowledge in criminal proceedings?

What should be understood as sources of knowledge in criminal proceedings?

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

What should be understood as sources of knowledge in criminal proceedings?

Annotation

PII

S1026-94520000616-5-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Evgenij Dolya Send message

Edition

Issue 1

Pages

68-80

Abstract

This article disputes the need of entering into scientific discussion, legislation and practice of proving in criminal cases of definition "the source of awareness” being identified with circumstances of crime or with respective objective factors. Methodological incapacity of suggested interpretation of this definition is displayed as well as negative consequences of its entering into practice.

Keywords

evidences, sources of evidences, sources of awareness, proving

Date of publication

01.01.2016

Number of purchasers

1

Views

1176

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Dolya E. What should be understood as sources of knowledge in criminal proceedings? // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2016. – Issue 1 C. 68-80 .
MLA	Dolya, Evgenij "What should be understood as sources of knowledge in criminal proceedings?." Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1 (2016).:68-80.
APA	Dolya E. (2016). What should be understood as sources of knowledge in criminal proceedings?. Gosudarstvo i pravo. no. 1, pp.68-80

References

Additional sources and materials

1. Zazhitskij V.I. Istochniki osvedomlennosti v ugolovno-protsessual'nom dokazyvanii // Sov. yustitsiya. 1983. № 8. S. 6-8. 
 
 2. Bashkatov L.N., Vetrova G.N., Dontsenko A.D., Zazhitskij V.I., Shestakov V.I. Ugolovnyj protsess. M., 2000. S. 95 
 
 3. Zazhitskij V.I. Ponyatie dokazatel'stva // V kn.: Ugolovnyj protsess. Ehlementarnyj kurs / Pod red. L.N. Bashkatova. M., 2001. S. 10 
 
 4. Zazhitskij V.I. Rezul'taty operativnorozysknoj deyatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoriya i praktika. SPb., 2006. S. 333, 334. 
 
 5. Dolya E.A. K voprosu ob istochnikakh osvedomlennosti v ugolovno-protsessual'nom dokazyvanii (Mify i real'nost') // Ross. yustitsiya. 2009. № 4. S. 59-62. Stat'ya pomeschena v zhurnale pod rubrikoj "Priglashenie k diskussii".

Comments

No posts found

Write a review

Translate